What is it with ice cream that attracts trademark infringements? First Ben & Jerry’s (earlier post here) and now Häagen-Dasz.
Owner of the Häagen-Dasz trademark, General Mills, has won an important case before a Chinese court against the use of the name ‘Haager-Dasz’.
Although the Chinese brand Haager-Dasz was registered for ‘clothing’, a Beijing Court dismissed a ruling by the trade appeal board. The appeal board ruled earlier that the trademark Häagen-Dazs wasn’t sufficiently well known with the “relevant” Chinese public.
The higher court did not agree: the “Haagen-Dazs” ice cream brand is well known. It is very likely that the public will be confused if the clothing maker could use “Haager Dasz” on its products. Use of such a similar-sounding mark is “obviously malicious”, the court said.
A big win for General Mills, and justly so, MarkMatters.com thinks. Such clear and obvious infringements must be stopped.
Trademark Trivia: for those of you who think Häagen-Dasz is a Scandinavian brand, you are so wrong. The mark originates from the US, from the New York City Bronx, to be exact. Polish immigrant Reuben Mattus invented the Danish sounding Häagen-Dazs as a tribute to Denmark’s exemplary treatment of its Jews during the Second World War. Mattus also thought that Denmark was known for its dairy products and had a positive image in the US. Mattus’ daughter once stated that her father sat at the kitchen table for hours, saying nonsensical words until he came up with a combination he liked. The reason he chose this method was so that the name would be unique and original. As the best brand names often are.
HEEFT UW MERK AANDACHT NODIG?
Wilt u meer informatie over de bescherming van uw merk?